-
The first step of any Revit Model Maintenance process begins with a Detach from Central with Audit. Here are our recommended procedures when creating a new central.1. Have all users SWC, Sync with Central, and relinquish all borrowed or owned worksets. I believe no one should own a workset, only borrow from them.2. Close all Local Files.3. The BIM Manager will open the Central model, by selecting “Detach from Central” along with “Audit”.a. When the BIM manager works in the Central Model. No one should attempt to open or create a new local.b. All work is stopped at this point.4. The BIM Manager should perform the “Purge All Unused” tool.5. Check that the worksets are being utilized properly. Be sure to create worksets for links and to utilize the opportunity to close worksets when creating new locals. Please refer to my blog; “Worksets for Performance”6. Check and resolve all Warnings. Easier said than done. This should be an ongoing effort from the start of any project.7. At this point the Backup and Revit folders related to the Central Model are useless, they should be deleted. If the team is experiencing permission issues, this can help. The Revit SLOG file could be corrupt and will be re-created after performing these maintenance steps.8. Once the backup and Revit folders are deleted the BIM Manager can create a new Central Model by performing a save-as and choosing “Make this a Central Model after save” in the options dialog with “Compact Central” checked. While in this dialog always ensure the followinga. Indicate the “Maximum” number of backups. 20 is the defaultb. Choose the option of “Specify” under the section called “Open Workset Default” This gives each local user the option to close worksets when creating their new local file. Close DWG Links workset will offer an enormous performance benefit. Please refer to my blog; “Worksets for Performance”c. Choose a simple drafting view, “Bulletin Board” as the source for the “Thumbnail Preview” section.9. All users can now Create New Local files.Perhaps this might also be helpful: Best Practices for Revit Projects - RevitZen -
3D Printing - on the 3D Systems ZP450http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_profilepage&v=SEb5ZEm13Rc1
View comments
-
What functionality does Autodesk’s Project Spark have? One of my favorite Revit expert & blogger, David Light, posted a great description of Project Spark and listed all of the things one cannot do; Project Spark – quick overview. In this post I’d like to explain what it can do. One can create RVT projects and RFA families. The most important item to discuss before we get started is the file version difference. One cannot open a RVT created in Project Sparks in the current 2012 version of Revit, it’s a newer format RVT. If you try to open a 2012 RVT into Sparks you will be stopped by a dialog offering to link the RVT instead. It will temporarily upgrade the RVT to be viewed within Project Spark. When Spark becomes a full-fledged product, then interoperability with the Revit family of products would certainly be considered.
With Project Spark one can create levels, grids, walls, doors, windows, floors, rooms and areas. We can do simplified phasing, what time is it? One can create all of the major Revit elements and some Structural elements . . . . but not a single massing object. We can create curtain walls but not massing so, no curtain systems. Remember the day of curtain system by lines? Where did that disappear to? We may not need curtain system by lines in our current version of Revit, but it sure would be nice in Project Spark. Back to what can be created. Almost all types of families other than the massing and pattern based families can be created and will be compatible with the other versions of Revit in the future. We all agree this is where Sparks’s future can shine, allowing content creators to create without purchasing the full version. I’m sure we’re all wondering what will a simplified version of Revit cost.
The main question I am posing to the AEC community is; “Can Project Spark create a proper Building Information Model. Are these tools enough? Project Spark offers designers the ability to create a very rich information model. We can create commercial, residential, interiors and any conceivable form of architecture. Can we create the same quality of space that we can create using a full version of Revit? It seems so. In summary, Project Spark could truly make a mark on the industry if it graduates from the labs. We shall see. How will you use it?
Give it a try then come back and leave your comments.
Getting StartedThanks,
Roger
1View comments
-
The Zen of Procrastination;Live in the now, not in the later. I'm trying to avoid weighing myself down with the heaviness of a job not yet started or the looming project not yet completed. Like blogging ;-) Why wait? Write that post, share that thought. I am going to contemplate more on the things that stop me from blogging, and get down to doing. Please comment on this post with topics you'd like me to explore.Thank you,Roger2
View comments
-
I'm back from my hiatus;I've been on a mountain top, deep in meditation, a never ending quest for enlightenment. ;-)In order to advance oneself we must advance others.Please find a link to my latest webinar in a series of videosIntroduction to Autodesk Navisworks Webinar Seriesclick the image below:1View comments
-
Worksharing is my approach over Workset ownership. Why put undo stress on the team by taking ownership of entire worksets? Rather borrow only what elements you are working on and relinquish upon syncing with central.
When establishing worksets think performance over ownership. I recommend we use worksets to allow visibility control and more importantly to allow a local user to close the worksets they do not need to be loaded in their local file. Experience has proven this is an enormous opportunity to increase overall project performance.More on this in the future. Please comment.1View comments
-
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man."
-George Bernard Shaw1View comments
-
As I continue to contemplate on “the Zen of Revit" I commonly return to the effort of using Revit. Most of my effort this month has been spent finding my tools within the ribbons, but that's another post. . . coming soon.Effort and RevitHow much effort do I contribute and how much effort does Revit contribute? If you have used Revit for any amount of time at all you have noticed that Revit does a lot of the work. How can we optimize Revit’s effort?Optimization:The procedure or procedures used to make a system or design as effective or functional as possible, especially the mathematical techniques involved. In other posts we talked about simplifying the model, the views, etc. Here I will illustrate ways in which we can limit the amount of computational effort Revit has to perform.Revit Architecture:The effort of calculating volume, If you’re not scheduling volume in your room schedule don’t have Revit calculate it. Thankfully it’s off by default.Revit Structure:
Analytical Model Management
If you are not using the analytical model features of Revit Structure or are not too concerned about the analytical model accuracy, you may be able to significantly improve model performance by turning these features off in the user interface or disabling them in the RevitStructure.ini file.
To turn off the features in the user interface, click Manage tab ➤ Project Settings panel ➤ Structural Settings.
Then, on the Analytical Model Settings tab of the Structural Settings dialog, under Automatic Checks, clear the Member Supports and Analytical/Physical Model Consistency options.
To disable these features, use Notepad to open the RevitStructure.ini file (located in the C:\Program Files\ RevitStructure2010\Program folder) and add the two lines shown below to the end of the file:.. .. . .
[Misc]DisplayRecentFilesPage=1[AppFrame]Theme=0[Graphics]InvertBackground=0Antialiasing=0[Recent File List]File1=C:\Users\rliucci.MICROSOL\Documents\BSD Demos\Revit Structure\GASAI_Structure_2010.rvt[Recent Workset List]Config1=AllConfig2=All[Analytical]DontUpdateAnalyticalSupportInfo=1Change to 0 in order to re-enable the analytical processingNOTE To disable the analytical support feature for a worksharing project, make the above modification to theRevitStructure.ini file on all local computers that are used on the project.To enable this feature again for the existing project or for a new project, either delete the above two lines from the .ini file; or change the value from 1 to 0.NOTE After re-enabling analytical support on an existing project, you may experience a significant delay when opening the model or adding new structural elements, because Revit Structure must reload all the analytical check information into the model. After the computation is done, no further delays should occur. If possible, avoid excessive modeling of 3D connections in Revit Structure. For typical detail creation, use 2D detail component connections (such as connection plates and bolts) instead.Revit MEP 2010 Software Optimization and Best PracticesView PerformanceThe Model Graphics Style settings have the largest impact on performance for view manipulation operations (scroll, pan, and zoom). Due to the requirement to dynamically generate gaps and hidden lines when elements overlap in the view, the Hidden Line style requires the most processing and thus results in a noticeable performance impact in views with many visible elements. The following best practices will help to mitigate this performance impact and streamline project workflows.Modeling and Sheet ViewsTo streamline project workflow, it is recommended to create both modeling and sheet views for the same regions of the building.Follow these guidelines:■ Modeling views should be configured to use the Wireframe model graphics style.■ Sheet views should be configured to use the Hidden Line model graphics style to produce the desired appearance for construction documentation.■ For your sheet views, use dependent views, which allows you to have multiple regions of an overall level in different views, without requiring duplicate annotations.■ Differentiate modeling views from sheet views both in the view name and sub-discipline to provide alogical organization of the view for users, and help to ensure proper usage.■ Use view templates to streamline the creation of these views and achieve consistency.■ Use duct and pipe color fills only in modeling views where the Wireframe model graphics style is used.Revit MEP 2010 Software Optimization and Best PracticesOptimizing Hidden Line PerformancePerformance in views with the Hidden Line model graphics style enabled is directly related to the numberof faces displayed in the view. Although elements display as 2D lines in a Revit view, in the model they are 3D objects made up of faces. The faces are processed by the Revit graphics system and display in the view as 2D lines. Use the following best practices to optimize the performance of views with the Hidden Line model graphics style enabled.■ Avoid using the Fine detail level when working in mechanical views unless necessary, as multi-line representations slow performance. Displaying pipes as 1-line at Medium detail level is usually sufficient when working with HVAC systems.■ If using complex 3D components in your building service designs, turn off the visibility of the complex 3D geometry in your sheet views. In place of the complex 3D geometry, use model lines that convey the overall component shape in the family definition. Make those model lines visible at the detail level defined in your sheet views.■ If not necessary for documentation when working with hidden lines in a view, setting the Mech Hidden value for Inside Gap and Outside Gap to 0 can provide substantial performance improvements.Model Manipulation PerformanceRevit MEP allows users to create models of building services, often in the form of large connected networks.The powerful analytical capabilities of Revit MEP, in conjunction with the Revit Parametric Change Engine, allow data to flow throughout the connected network when manipulations are made. Improper structure and configuration of large connected networks has been shown to have a severe impact on model manipulation performance. In comparative testing, models have been shown to perform significantly better when structured properly. As a connected network grows, the performance of model manipulations (such as moving elements, changing flows, and connecting new elements) is impacted by a number of factors. Understanding these factors, and adhering to the best practices outlined below, will allow for optimal model performance.Create SystemsCreate logical systems for your connected networks, rather than leaving all elements on the default system. Associating elements into systems helps to streamline data propagation and facilitates the analytical uses of systems, such as in pressure drop calculations. Testing of customer models with all elements on the default system showed significant improvements when the connected network was restructured as logical systems.Set Correct Connector Flow DirectionsEnsure that the Flow Direction parameter for connectors on families in the connected network is not set to Bidirectional unless the family is placed in-line with connected networks like dampers and valves. The Bidirectional setting can make flow determination more difficult and thus impact regeneration performance.In Conclusion:Although Revit is one powerful database there are many many instances where we must manipulate the way we approach the way we use the tool. There are so many benefits and few issues that distract from design.I was hoping that Revit MEP had a similar option for disabling the processing and diagnostics of built systems or networks. This is not the case in MEP 2010. Many engineers might say that to change their process to match Revit’s requirements in less than ideal. But as we in the BIM word have said before;
"It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory." -- W(illiam) Edwards Deming“If you don't like something change it; if you can't change it, change the way you think about it.“
~Mary Engelbreit1View comments
-
It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.~W. Edwards DemingIf you don't like something change it; if you can't change it, change the way you think about it.
~Mary EngelbreitHe who rejects change is the architect of decay.The only human institution which rejects progress is the cemetery.~Harold Wilson0Add a comment
View comments